YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by David Krueger

Avatar
Cambridge faculty - AI alignment, DL, and existential safety. Formerly Mila, FHI, DeepMind, ElementAI, AISI.
None of these approaches that you'll often hear mentioned—interpretability, testing or alignment—is technically adequate. We don't know how to build superintelligent AI safely. The plan is basically to roll the dice.
AI Verified (Feb 2, 2026)
Source:
David Krueger, testimony to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, February 2, 2026.
Like Share on X 19h ago

Policy proposals and claims

AI alignment is solvable
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Krueger says current approaches are inadequate and superintelligent AI cannot be built safely; directly opposes solvability. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Recorded against matches Krueger's conclusion that available approaches cannot build superintelligent AI safely. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Canadian House of Commons ETHI evidence, 2 Feb 2026, records David Krueger's wording. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19h ago
replying to David Krueger