Comment by Geoffrey Irving

AI safety researcher; former safety researcher at OpenAI and Google DeepMind, former chief scientist at the UK AI Security Institute, and cofounder and chief scientist of Resolution.
Now. My take is that if we were to carefully analyse this question of exactly when we should slow down, it would be a while ago in the past, because we’re just too close to this crazy future. Trying to be super precise about exactly when in the future, like, no, no, no: “Already” is the answer.
AI Verified (Aug 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 1mo ago

Policy proposals and claims

votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Irving says the time to slow AI was already in the past, opposing waiting until human-genius level to pause. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer: against. Irving says AI should have slowed already, opposing waiting until human-genius level for a pause. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified 80,000 Hours transcript, August 11 2026, attributes this wording to Geoffrey Irving. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1mo ago
replying to Geoffrey Irving

Other opinions from Geoffrey Irving

See all

AI alignment is solvable

I think that could work. I don’t think we have a strong argument that the pragmatic mixture of approaches will get all the way there, but it just seems very dicey, and our understanding of the dynamics involved is very weak.
AI Verified source (Aug 11, 2026)
Like Comment Share on X added 1mo ago

Other authors to follow