Comment by Geoffrey Irving

AI safety researcher; former safety researcher at OpenAI and Google DeepMind, former chief scientist at the UK AI Security Institute, and cofounder and chief scientist of Resolution.
I think that could work. I don’t think we have a strong argument that the pragmatic mixture of approaches will get all the way there, but it just seems very dicey, and our understanding of the dynamics involved is very weak.
AI Verified (Aug 11, 2026)
Like Share on X 20d ago

Policy proposals and claims

abstains
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Irving directly discusses whether alignment approaches can succeed; his qualified uncertainty supplies a determinate stance. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Irving describes a possible solution but emphasizes weak evidence and uncertainty; recorded abstain matches. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified 80,000 Hours transcript contains the exact Geoffrey Irving wording. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 19d ago
replying to Geoffrey Irving

Other opinions from Geoffrey Irving

See all

Other authors to follow