Nanda Min Htin on AI | YouCongress

Nanda Min Htin

Privacy, AI governance and AI safety lawyer specializing in the United States and Asia-Pacific.

The burden should lie on the developer to prove they have provided a tool that is capable of being overseen. One way is to require developers to comply with technical standards to build models that are inherently understandable and build in the necessary signals for human intervention.

AI Verified (Feb 9, 2026)

Source:

Nanda Min Htin, “Redefining the Standard of Human Oversight for AI Negligence,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, February 9, 2026.

7h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

AI Verified Harvard JOLT’s Feb. 9, 2026 article by Nanda Min Htin contains the stored wording verbatim and correctly attributes it. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5 · 5h ago

replying to Nanda Min Htin

Other opinions from Nanda Min Htin

See all

Nanda Min Htin votes For

Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

Thus, deployers should be required to report major AI failures or even near-misses to a central database.

AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Nanda Min Htin votes For

Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

If a machine errs, a human should be present to intervene, correct the course, and absorb the responsibility, while being incentivized to implement safety mechanisms.

AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Nanda Min Htin votes Against

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

By holding developers liable for every downstream misuse, it could strangle open-source development, whereas negligence caps liability at “reasonable” care.

AI Verified source (Feb 9, 2026)

added 3mo ago