We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-ethics (3)
×
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
policy (3)
regulations (2)
research-policy (2)
ai (1)
ai-policy (1)
ai-risk (1)
existential-risk (1)
future (1)
international-relations (1)
transparency (1)
Top
New
-
Michael Kratsios votes For and says:
Future models may be really good at nuclear-related threats, so, for us, when we think about it broadly as a government, we have to build that capacity across a wide variety of technical domains to test these models.
AI Verified source (May 4, 2026) -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
154 opinionsMichael Kratsios votes Against and says:
We totally reject global governance of AI. We believe AI adoption cannot lead to a brighter future if it is subject to bureaucracies and centralized control. Prioritizing AI for your people does not mean joining international efforts that are either ...
more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2 -
Michael Kratsios votes Against and says:
We totally reject all efforts by international bodies to assert centralized control and global governance of AI. [...] Ideological fixations on social equity, climate catastrophism and so-called existential risk are dangers to progress and obstacles ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 24, 2025)