Comment by Lionel Tarassenko

Oxford engineer and Crossbench life peer
I therefore proposed a Private Member’s Bill, not drawn in the ballot, which would establish AISI as an independent statutory body. It would make provision for its functions in relation to the testing and evaluation of advanced AI systems, including pre-deployment and post-deployment assessment of risks, and for the institute to give advice to the Government and Parliament.
AI Verified (Jun 4, 2026)
Like Share on X 1h ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: proposed AISI statutory functions expressly include pre-/post-deployment advanced-AI risk assessment, directly relevant to safety evaluations before deployment. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: author proposes statutory AISI pre-/post-deployment advanced-AI risk assessment, supporting “for” the safety-evaluation requirement. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: Lord Tarassenko directly describes his Bill establishing AISI and pre-/post-deployment risk assessment. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Lionel Tarassenko