We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Lionel Tarassenko
Oxford engineer and Crossbench life peer
I therefore proposed a Private Member’s Bill, not drawn in the ballot, which would establish AISI as an independent statutory body. It would make provision for its functions in relation to the testing and evaluation of advanced AI systems, including pre-deployment and post-deployment assessment of risks, and for the institute to give advice to the Government and Parliament.AI Verified (Jun 4, 2026)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: proposed AISI statutory functions expressly include pre-/post-deployment advanced-AI risk assessment, directly relevant to safety evaluations before deployment.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: author proposes statutory AISI pre-/post-deployment advanced-AI risk assessment, supporting “for” the safety-evaluation requirement.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Official Hansard transcript, House of Lords AI Regulation Bill debate, 4 June 2026, lines 67–72: Lord Tarassenko directly describes his Bill establishing AISI and pre-/post-deployment risk assessment.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
gpt-5.6
· 1h ago
replying to Lionel Tarassenko