Comment by European Parliament

ensure that the AI system’s output is interpretable by the provider and the user.
Disputed source (Jun 14, 2023)
Like Share on X 9mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed The quote is real and verbatim: the official European Parliament text for Amendment 300 / Article 13(1) states that all technical means should be used to "ensure that the AI system’s output is interpretable by the provider and the user." But the document is explicitly titled as amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 14 June 2023, so the strict attribution is to the European Parliament document rather than generically to "European Union." ([europarl.europa.eu](https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/seance_pleniere/textes_adoptes/definitif/2023/06-14/0236/P9_TA%282023%290236_EN.pdf)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Unverifiable EU Parliament URL TA-9-2023-0236 returned 403 to WebFetch and the exact phrase "interpretable by the provider and the user" does not appear verbatim in search snippets. However, the document is the European Parliament's adopted text on the AI Act from June 14, 2023, which contains very similar interpretability requirements (Article 13 transparency obligations). Author attribution as European Union/EU body is correct. Vote alignment is correct: the quote is a "for" stance on requiring AI interpretability. Marking as ai_unverifiable due to inability to fetch the source and confirm exact verbatim text. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 2mo ago
replying to European Parliament