We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Choose people for your Council
Their For/Against majority represents you.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (6)
×
ai-regulation (6)
ai-policy (4)
ai-safety (4)
policy (4)
ai (3)
ai-risk (3)
ethics (3)
regulations (3)
research-policy (2)
transparency (2)
ai-ethics (1)
defense (1)
existential-risk (1)
future (1)
Top
New
-
Apollo Research votes For and says:
Apply access parity between internal and external evaluators. Where a frontier AI company’s internal evaluations relied on particular access modalities, then their external evaluators should receive functionally equivalent access unless the AI compan...
more AI Verified source (May 20, 2026) -
Apollo Research votes For and says:
To address this emerging challenge and guarantee state-of-the-art AI assurance, external evaluators need deeper access, including white-box access, to counter evaluation awareness.
AI Verified source (May 20, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Apollo Research votes For and says:
Black-box evaluations have historically proven valuable to provide a precursory assessment of the safety and security of frontier AI models ahead of model deployment.
AI Verified source (May 20, 2026) -
Apollo Research votes For and says:
-
AI labs should conduct risk assessments before high-stakes internal deployment of frontier models
41 opinionsApollo Research votes For and says:Expand Frontier Safety Policies (FSPs) to explicitly cover internal AI deployment, with specific evaluations for scheming detection and control before internal use and appropriate mitigations.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2025) -
Apollo Research votes For and says:
High Potential to Accelerate AI Security [...] Section 224 enables the Secretary of War to establish National Security and Defense Artificial Intelligence Institutes within eligible host institutions.
AI Verified source (2025)