We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-safety (10)
×
ai-governance (9)
ai-regulation (8)
policy (6)
ai-policy (5)
ai-risk (5)
existential-risk (5)
ai (4)
ethics (4)
future (4)
regulations (4)
ai-ethics (3)
agi (2)
open-source (2)
transparency (2)
Top
New
-
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
This suggests pacing the advances: not training or deploying AIs without a strong safety case that convinces independent experts.
AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026) 1 of 3 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
This suggests pacing the advances: not training or deploying AIs without a strong safety case that convinces independent experts.
AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
Besides loss of control, the other catastrophic possibility is humans using AI to construct an eventually worldwide dictatorship. A small group of humans could concentrate all the power that AI will have, especially if we achieve AGI or superintellig...
more Unverifiable source (May 7, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
The simplest form of treaty would be something like this, that the countries agree that if they do develop advanced AI: * That it will be done in a safe way. So maybe using techniques like Scientist AI or whatever else we have strong assurances for. ...
more AI Verified source (May 7, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
Frontier AI systems could surpass most individuals across most cognitive tasks within just a few years. These advances could unlock solutions to major global challenges, but they also carry significant risks. To safely advance toward superintelligenc...
more AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
The right way to do this is if a model, before it is released in open weights or in other ways, a model should be tested. Can it be used by people? Are we sure we’re not going to lose control of it? Does it have the capabilities or intentions that co...
more AI Verified source (Mar 12, 2026) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
I'm now very confident that it is possible to build AI systems that don't have hidden goals, hidden agendas. [...] A Scientist AI would be trained to give truthful answers based on transparent, probabilistic reasoning.
AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2 -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
193 opinions
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
But in the future, who should decide where to draw the line and how to weigh the pros and cons? CEOs of companies or democratically chosen governments? The answer should be obvious if you believe in democracy.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2024) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
Moreover, frontier AI companies are seeking to develop AI with a specific skill that could very well unlock all others and turbocharge advances: AIs with the ability to advance research in AI. An AI system that would be as capable at AI research as t...
more AI Verified source (2024) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
I think it's really important, because when we put open source out there for something that could be dangerous, which is a tiny minority of all the code that's open source, essentially we're opening the door to all the bad actors. And as these system...
more Unverified source (Jul 25, 2023) 1 of 2