We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
policy (10)
×
ai-governance (9)
ai-regulation (8)
ai (6)
ai-safety (6)
ai-ethics (5)
ai-policy (4)
regulations (4)
ai-risk (3)
existential-risk (3)
international-relations (3)
open-source (3)
research-policy (3)
economics (2)
ethics (2)
Top
New
-
Democratic middle powers should jointly develop frontier AI and share its benefits globally
38 opinions
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
To guarantee access to frontier models and mitigate the risks of major power concentrations, middle powers must collaborate to form a broad coalition with shared values and complementary resources.
AI Verified source (May 29, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
Besides loss of control, the other catastrophic possibility is humans using AI to construct an eventually worldwide dictatorship. A small group of humans could concentrate all the power that AI will have, especially if we achieve AGI or superintellig...
more Unverifiable source (May 7, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
151 opinions
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
The simplest form of treaty would be something like this, that the countries agree that if they do develop advanced AI: * That it will be done in a safe way. So maybe using techniques like Scientist AI or whatever else we have strong assurances for. ...
more AI Verified source (May 7, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
Frontier AI systems could surpass most individuals across most cognitive tasks within just a few years. These advances could unlock solutions to major global challenges, but they also carry significant risks. To safely advance toward superintelligenc...
more AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes Against
and says:
We must be intentional and make collective, democratic choices, rather than letting market forces play out and risking leaving most citizens behind.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
The right way to do this is if a model, before it is released in open weights or in other ways, a model should be tested. Can it be used by people? Are we sure we’re not going to lose control of it? Does it have the capabilities or intentions that co...
more AI Verified source (Mar 12, 2026) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
-
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
As a result, concentrated economic power in one or two countries could trigger economic and social crises elsewhere, unless the economic benefits of AI are globally shared or at least unless the same level of AI competence is available at an equitabl...
more AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2025) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
This risk should further motivate us to redesign the global political system in a way that would completely eradicate wars and thus obviate the need for military organizations and military weapons. [...] It goes without saying that lethal autonomous...
more AI Verified source (2023) -
Yoshua Bengio
votes For
and says:
I think it's really important, because when we put open source out there for something that could be dangerous, which is a tiny minority of all the code that's open source, essentially we're opening the door to all the bad actors. And as these system...
more Unverified source (Jul 25, 2023) 1 of 2