We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-risk (3)
×
ai-safety (3)
ai-ethics (2)
policy (2)
transparency (2)
ai-policy (1)
ethics (1)
open-source (1)
regulations (1)
research-policy (1)
Top
New
-
Future of Life Institute
votes For
and says:
Releasing full model weights may allow malicious actors to strip or override safety mechanisms, creating uncensored or harmful versions. In contrast, supervised fine-tuning preserves core safety guardrails while enabling responsible customization.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026) -
Future of Life Institute
votes For
and says:
Leading AI companies should: Ensure Human-Legible Reasoning - AI models should reason in ways that are accessible and understandable to humans. Developers should avoid opaque reasoning methods.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026) -
Future of Life Institute
votes For
and says:
Broaden dangerous-capability evaluations and link thresholds to binding mitigations. Evaluations have gaping holes (no AI R&D data), and no procedure connects threshold breaches to deployment decisions, making thresholds effectively non-binding.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026) 1 of 2