We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expert opinions on AI Risk
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances on AI Risk from AI researchers, executives and policymakers.
775 sourced quotes · 10 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
AI alignment is solvable
92 opinions
For (43)Adam MajmudarResearcher and special-projects contributor at OpenAI; formerly a founding engineer at thirdweb.votes For and says:Yea this is the most important result of the year, at the level of significance of “Attention Is All You Need”. It brings us from “is alignment even solvable” to “we may solve alignment in the next year.”
AI Verified source (Oct 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (14)Satya NadellaMicrosoft CEOabstains and says:I used to always think that, you know, alignment will just fall out. I no longer believe that. So I think this alignment thing may be a harder, different problem.
AI Verified source (Oct 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (36)Marius HobbhahnCEO and co-founder of Apollo Research; AI safety researcher specializing in scheming and pre-deployment evaluations of frontier AI systemsvotes Against and says:Fundamentally, we just do not know how to do alignment. If somebody came with a thousand-page document that explained exactly how to do everything, we couldn’t get a model to learn exactly that.
AI Verified source (Oct 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (57)Stephen CasperAI safety researcher at the UK AI Security Institute, researching safeguards for open-weight AI models.votes For and says:
Open models have a tendency to be less safe a lot of the time than closed ones. Maybe it could be misused by someone who downloads it and modifies it to remove safeguards or to sharpen its harmful capabilities. This type of fine-tuning could cost hun...
more AI Verified source (Oct 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Daniel CommeyAuthor of a 2026 game-theoretic study of open-weight AI release policy.abstains and says:Restricting access to a dual-use AI model is precautionary only if it delays harmful actors more than defenders. That condition varies across actors: a state agency or organized criminal group may obtain a substitute through theft, distillation, inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (56)The Washington Post Editorial BoardEditorial board of The Washington Post, publishing the newspaper’s institutional opinions.votes Against and says:Open-weight models have been a boon for defenders. When Hugging Face investigated how OpenAI-powered agents penetrated its systems, proprietary models refused some of the forensic work, but the Chinese open-weight model GLM-5.2 helped reconstruct the...
more AI Verified source (Oct 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI might become conscious
97 opinions
For (65)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:My belief is that today’s models are not conscious, or if they are, it’s a very strange form of it. [...] Maybe the substrate matters, but maybe it doesn’t, and maybe energy flowing through matter can do it. And then in that world, sure, you can imag...
more AI Verified source (Oct 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (14)Ulysse KlatzmannPostdoctoral researcher in computational neuroscience at CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, studying consciousness and artificial intelligence.abstains and says:“I would be surprised if current AI models develop consciousness,” he said, “but we can’t entirely rule it out.”
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (19)Mustafa SuleymanMicrosoft AI CEO; authorvotes Against and says:AIs are not conscious. They do not feel, experience, or suffer. They do not have innate preferences or underlying motivations. They are sequence completion engines, internally hollow, designed to follow instructions, and accomplish goals set by human...
more AI Verified source (Sep 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI labs should conduct risk assessments before high-stakes internal deployment of frontier models
38 opinions
For (38)Reflection AIAI research company developing open-weight frontier models and publishing an Open Safety Framework.votes For and says:Internal use: The same systemic-risk assessment applies to internal use of frontier models, including research, operational systems, and internal products. Internal deployment is assessed against the same capability thresholds and safeguards as pre-r...
more AI Verified source (Oct 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (7)Cygnux LabsIndependent AI safety research lab and think tank focused on making autonomous AI systems verifiable, accountable, and safer to trust.votes For and says:
Physicists faced a version of this problem in the 1950s. No single lab could afford the machine they needed, so they pooled resources and built one together, with shared data and shared credit. This piece sketches what the same move could look like f...
more Unverifiable source (Oct 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes Against and says:It is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced. That’s why I am introducing legislation to immediately pause the development of increasingly powerful AI and ban the creation of systems that hu...
more AI Verified source (Sep 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
77 opinions
For (67)Ben GoertzelSingularityNET founder; AGI researchervotes For and says:For a long time many of us thought of RSI as the way AGI turns into superintelligence. [...] I was advocating what I called a semi-hard takeoff: a period where the self-improvement was real but not that fast, followed by a point -- once the AGI fully...
more AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)votes Against and says:I do not think this will happen. I don’t think that automating AI R&D will rapidly produce domain-general superintelligence. I don’t think that a data centre of geniuses, largely separated from the rest of the economy, will figure out how to cure Alz...
more AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (80)Jason McEwenInterim Chief Scientist and Mission Director for Fundamental Research in AI at the Alan Turing Institute; Professor at University College London.votes For and says:
The scientific work now is to ensure reasoning of powerful AI models remains observable as they become more capable, or to build the tools to read it where it is not, and to verify that complete AI systems, not just the models inside them, can be rel...
more AI Verified source (Sep 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Reid HoffmanLinkedIn co-founder, venture capitalist, author of Superagencyabstains and says:We have a very natural instinct to say: we want as much interpretability as possible. One of the sci-fi worry cases is that agents start speaking in languages to each other that we don't understand. [...] I bet there are ways to define boundaries tha...
more Unverifiable source (Jan 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Jessica NewmanResearch fellow at UC Berkeley CLTCvotes Against and says:Explainable AI (XAI) is often offered as the answer to the black box problem and is broadly defined as “machine learning techniques that make it possible for human users to understand, appropriately trust, and effectively manage AI.” Around the world...
more Unverifiable source (May 19, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (171)Patricia FahyNew York State Senator for the 46th District and sponsor of the 2026 TERMINATOR Act on frontier-AI safety oversight.votes For and says:
Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model or a substantially modified version of an existing frontier model, a large frontier developer shall include in the transparency report required by paragraph (a) of this subdivision, summari...
more AI Verified source (Sep 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Kent WalkerGoogle President of Global Affairsvotes Against and says:For the most advanced frontier AI models, an independent, federally overseen, industry-backed organization could set safety standards and verify independent, voluntary audits, similar to how other critical sectors are managed.
AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (19)Jamie JoyceCalifornia congressional candidate and author of the MAD Act, a proposed federal AI-governance framework.votes For and says:
The term “open-weight AI model” means an AI model for which the model weights are made publicly available without restriction on access. [...] “meaningful uplift” means specific operational assistance that would materially advance an adversary’s CBRN...
more Unverifiable source (Aug 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Andrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:They tried to pass laws to stifle [free open-source AI software]. ... After that narrative lost credibility, and our government no longer believes that, thank God, the same people said, “Oh, AI could create bioweapons.” After the RAND and other studi...
more AI Verified source (Aug 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.