We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
policy (6)
脳
ai-regulation (5)
regulations (4)
ai-governance (3)
privacy (3)
us-congress (3)
ai (2)
ai-policy (2)
ai-safety (2)
deepfakes (2)
digital-rights (2)
disinformation (2)
ethics (2)
gov (2)
law (2)
Top
New
-
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
132 opinions
Kathy Hochul
votes For
and says:
Here in New York, we've stepped up, setting a national standard for transparency and accountability for frontier AI models. But states cannot solve this problem alone. The federal government must establish strong national standards that put public sa...
more Unverifiable source (Sep 9, 2026) -
Kathy Hochul
votes For
and says:
AI Deceptive Practices Act, which enhances protections against unauthorized use of likeness/voice and the unauthorized dissemination of intimate images.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026) -
Kathy Hochul
votes Against
and says:
But think about it, two things can be true at the same time: AI can and must be a force for good. At the same time, it could literally eliminate many entry and mid-level jobs that are the pathway to the middle class and beyond. If that occurs, we can...
more AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026) -
[馃嚭馃嚫 Congress, Mar 2025] Prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media of federal election candidates
85 opinions
Kathy Hochul
votes For
and says:
People deserve to trust what they see and hear during election season. So this year we鈥檒l require disclosures on all AI-generated images and videos so New Yorkers know what鈥檚 real and what鈥檚 not. And we鈥檒l strengthen our existing laws to prohibit dee...
more AI Verified source (Jan 13, 2026) -
Kathy Hochul
votes For
and says:
-
[馃嚭馃嚫 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
138 opinions
Kathy Hochul
votes For
and says: