We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (2)
ai-regulation (2)
ai-safety (2)
future (2)
×
ai (1)
ai-ethics (1)
ai-policy (1)
ethics (1)
existential-risk (1)
policy (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
105 opinions
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
Then, in the mid-2030s, they pause at AIs around the level of top human geniuses. These AIs are close enough to current AIs that the same alignment techniques that mostly-sort-of-work for ours might mostly-sort-of-work for them too... The plan is to ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026) -
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
If AI doesn't kill us, and there's no permanent dictatorship, and there's no permanent underclass, then we get a post-scarcity society, plus superintelligent AIs that we can set to working on other problems like disease and social decay.
Unverifiable source (2026)