We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (6)
×
ai-regulation (6)
ai-safety (5)
ai-policy (4)
policy (4)
ai (3)
regulations (3)
ai-ethics (2)
cybersecurity (2)
existential-risk (2)
future (2)
international-relations (2)
ai-risk (1)
china (1)
ethics (1)
Top
New
-
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
31 opinions
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
Then, in the mid-2030s, they pause at AIs around the level of top human geniuses. These AIs are close enough to current AIs that the same alignment techniques that mostly-sort-of-work for ours might mostly-sort-of-work for them too... The plan is to ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026) -
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
Hunting down all existing chips is only slightly harder. Most of these chips are in giant data centers the size of small cities using entire power plants' worth of electricity - so hard to hide. The rest can be traced to their final locations using c...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026) -
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
If AI doesn't kill us, and there's no permanent dictatorship, and there's no permanent underclass, then we get a post-scarcity society, plus superintelligent AIs that we can set to working on other problems like disease and social decay.
Unverifiable source (2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
56 opinions
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
A good pause strategy would involve both sides being able to monitor the other's data centers to prevent illegal training, then limiting training to some slow mutually-agreeable rate that lets alignment researchers thoroughly test each generation of ...
more AI Verified source (2026) -
Scott Alexander
votes For
and says:
Someday AIs really will be able to make nukes or pull off $500 million hacks. At that point, companies will have to certify that their model has been trained not to do this, and that it will stay trained. But if it were open-source, then anyone could...
more AI Verified source (2024)