Require all advanced AI chips to be registered and traceable to their physical location

ai-policy regulations privacy cybersecurity ai-governance law ai-regulation

Arguments for

Prevent diversion to adversaries

Supporters argue advanced AI chips are strategically important and are being smuggled or diverted to adversaries, especially China. They say requiring chips to be traceable and location-verified would help keep U.S. technology out of hostile military, surveillance, or other bad-actor uses and protect national security and America's technological edge.

China continues to flout U.S. export controls and this indictment is the latest example. China recognizes the superiority of American AI innovation and will do whatever it must to catch up. That’s why the bipartisan Chip Security Act is urgently needed. The bill will safeguard ou…

John Moolenaar · Mar 26, 2026 · full quote
If we allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue smuggling our most advanced AI chips into its military and surveillance state, it doesn’t just mean export controls that are on the books are going unenforced—we’re risking America’s technological edge, our national security, an…

Raja Krishnamoorthi · Jul 7, 2025 · full quote
AI is one of the most high-stakes fronts in our strategic competition with the Chinese Communist Party. The CCP has a track record of exploiting U.S. capital and intellectual property to develop its own advanced technology. I am proud to join my colleagues and introduce the Chip …

Darin LaHood · May 20, 2025 · full quote
If we're going to export advanced AI chips, we need confidence that they don’t end up in the hands of the Chinese military. We’re continuously seeing examples of Chinese espionage, theft, and diversion over and over again. We can’t allow this to keep happening.

Brian Mast · Mar 26, 2026 · full quote
The United States is in a global AI arms race with the Chinese Communist Party, and advanced chips are the crown jewel of American innovation. The Chip Security Act would implement common-sense security measures to prevent these chips from being diverted to our adversaries. This …

Connor Pfeiffer · Mar 25, 2026 · full quote

Close enforcement blind spots

Supporters say current export controls depend too heavily on declared destinations and leave regulators with limited visibility after deployment. Registration and location verification are described as a targeted way to surface chips outside authorized locations, improve investigations of transshipping violators, and make future compute-governance arrangements easier to enforce.

Advanced AI chips are among the most strategically important technologies in the world—but today’s export controls weren’t built to track them after deployment. [...] Current export controls depend on declared destinations, not real-world verification. Once chips leave the factor…

GeoComply · Mar 3, 2026 · full quote
The CSA doesn’t attempt to surge BIS personnel to Southeast Asia or rebuild the export control system from the ground up. Instead, it would introduce a surgical fix: location verification for chips exported abroad. If a chip shows up outside its authorized destination, the export…

Kit Conklin · Aug 18, 2025 · full quote
The idea behind CSA is not to prevent chips from working in banned locations like China but to simply expose more data to exporters of chips (and ultimately Bureau of Industry and Security-U.S. Department of Commerce) on their end-users to enhance investigations of transshipping …

Dmitri Alperovitch · Jul 16, 2025 · full quote
Fortunately, modern AI chips already have capabilities to support technical location verification, which would allow chip owners to easily provide regular verification that their chips remain in the approximate area of their intended destination. This kind of verification would g…

Asher Brass · May 16, 2025 · full quote
But the reality is that we have limited knowledge on the smuggling market and the exact number of chips even being trafficked. So although location verification for AI chips is not a perfect solution to end all smuggling, it could still be an effective tool and a step toward know…

Scott J Mulligan · May 19, 2025 · full quote
Smuggled chips make future agreements based on compute governance more difficult to enforce because it is hard for either the US or the Chinese government to trace smuggled chips.

AI Futures Project · Jul 9, 2026 · full quote

Feasible with existing tools

Several supporters argue modern high-end chips already have technical capabilities for location verification, and some proposed methods can meet verification requirements without compromising security. They add that many chips are hard to hide or traceable through records, making verification workable enough to explore through pilots and deployment.

Fortunately, modern AI chips already have capabilities to support technical location verification, which would allow chip owners to easily provide regular verification that their chips remain in the approximate area of their intended destination. This kind of verification would g…

Asher Brass · May 16, 2025 · full quote
The Chip Security Act (CSA) requires companies to verify that advanced AI chips remain in authorized locations to prevent diversion to foreign adversaries. [...] Ping-based location verification (PBLV) serves as a clear example of how the CSA's requirements can be met without com…

CAIS Action Fund · Dec 10, 2025 · full quote
Hunting down all existing chips is only slightly harder. Most of these chips are in giant data centers the size of small cities using entire power plants' worth of electricity - so hard to hide. The rest can be traced to their final locations using customer records from NVIDIA, T…

Scott Alexander · Jul 9, 2026 · full quote
The Action Plan includes valuable measures to get BIS better information about where and how smuggling is happening, through collaboration with the intelligence community, and location verification. Location verification for AI chips in particular is an idea that IAPS has champio…

Onni Aarne · Jul 24, 2025 · full quote

Trusted diffusion and governance

Proponents argue that better end-use confidence would let the U.S. expand its AI chips and technology stack into global markets without inadvertently helping adversaries. Some also frame registration and tracking as groundwork for future governance of advanced compute, not just a restriction on trade.

The Chip Security Act (CSA) is a bipartisan bill that would require high-end AI chips to have the capability to verify their location before being exported. [...] With the confidence that sensitive exports are going to their intended foreign buyers, the CSA is essential to enabli…

Samuel Hammond · Jul 18, 2025 · full quote
We must do better at maintaining and expanding our position in the global market, while safeguarding America’s technological edge. With these enhanced security measures, we can continue to expand access to U.S. technology without compromising our national security.

Tom Cotton · Jul 7, 2025 · full quote
We need to make sure that the AI infrastructure isn’t getting siphoned off to China. This bill advances our ability to expand our chips into global markets with peace of mind.

Cynthia Lummis · Jul 7, 2025 · full quote
Registering and tracking the ownership of high-end AI chips has become a widely discussed topic in US policy due to two factors: the developing US/China AI competition as evidenced by recent export controls limiting Chinese AI chip access, and the increasing attention on safety p…

Deric Cheng · Apr 8, 2024 · full quote
The Chinese Communist Party has proven time and again that they are bad faith actors when it comes to stealing American innovation. To maintain our AI dominance, we must prevent American technological exports from being diverted into black market bazaars or the back streets of Be…

With Honor Action · Sep 26, 2025 · full quote

Arguments against

Cybersecurity vulnerabilities

Critics warn that mandating location-verification capabilities on advanced chips could create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the systems they power. They argue this added risk could cascade into national, economic, and allied-security harms.

The Chip Security Act [...] would require American-made advanced chips to come equipped with location-verification capabilities creating new cybersecurity vulnerabilities that could compromise the systems they power. This could have a cascading impact, threatening not only Americ…

Luke O'Grady · Jul 15, 2025 · full quote

Untested blanket mandate

Opponents say a blanket requirement for new on-chip tracking mechanisms is complex, costly, untested, and potentially infeasible. In their view, the proposal is not currently a viable solution and could do more harm than good if rushed into law.

SIA members are fully committed to complying with export controls, and we strongly oppose the illicit diversion and misuse of our chip technologies. While we understand policymakers’ interest in addressing this issue, we cannot support blanket mandates for new, untested, and pote…

John Neuffer · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote
While the Chip Security Act sounds like a sharp response to a real problem involving export control evasion and technology diversion, it is not currently a viable solution, and even more concerning, it risks doing more harm than good.

Joseph Hoefer · May 29, 2025 · full quote

Trust and privacy backlash

Another criticism is that a government tracking mandate would signal deeper U.S. government control over the AI stack, raising concerns about the security, reliability, and privacy of U.S. technology. Critics say that perception could undermine global trust in American semiconductors.

Next week, the House Foreign Affairs Committee will consider the Chip Security Act (S.1705 / H.R.3447), which would require companies to track exported AI chips. While there are valid commercial reasons for companies to pursue location verification, a government chip tracking man…

Mike Flynn · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote
SIA members are fully committed to complying with export controls, and we strongly oppose the illicit diversion and misuse of our chip technologies. While we understand policymakers’ interest in addressing this issue, we cannot support blanket mandates for new, untested, and pote…

John Neuffer · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Investigative tool, not cure-all

Some supporters present location verification as one part of a broader effort to gather better information about smuggling. They describe it as a surgical investigative tool worth exploring or piloting, not a standalone mechanism that will solve every diversion problem.

The idea behind CSA is not to prevent chips from working in banned locations like China but to simply expose more data to exporters of chips (and ultimately Bureau of Industry and Security-U.S. Department of Commerce) on their end-users to enhance investigations of transshipping …

Dmitri Alperovitch · Jul 16, 2025 · full quote
But the reality is that we have limited knowledge on the smuggling market and the exact number of chips even being trafficked. So although location verification for AI chips is not a perfect solution to end all smuggling, it could still be an effective tool and a step toward know…

Scott J Mulligan · May 19, 2025 · full quote
The Action Plan includes valuable measures to get BIS better information about where and how smuggling is happening, through collaboration with the intelligence community, and location verification. Location verification for AI chips in particular is an idea that IAPS has champio…

Onni Aarne · Jul 24, 2025 · full quote
The CSA doesn’t attempt to surge BIS personnel to Southeast Asia or rebuild the export control system from the ground up. Instead, it would introduce a surgical fix: location verification for chips exported abroad. If a chip shows up outside its authorized destination, the export…

Kit Conklin · Aug 18, 2025 · full quote

Insights

Both supporters and opponents describe illicit diversion and misuse of advanced AI chips as a real problem; the dispute is over whether mandatory traceability is an effective and acceptable remedy.
Many quotes discuss exported chips, foreign buyers, and authorized destinations abroad, so the debate in this set is largely framed through export-control enforcement.
Several supporters describe location verification as an investigative or visibility tool that helps regulators know where smuggling is happening, rather than as a mechanism that by itself stops chips from operating.
Supporters often connect stricter traceability to broader market access, arguing that better verification could support wider global diffusion of U.S. chips with more confidence.
The opposition quotes in this set come from semiconductor, IT, cybersecurity, and technology-policy organizations, and they emphasize feasibility, cost, privacy, reliability, and trust in U.S. technology.

Across the quotes, there is broad concern about diversion of advanced AI chips and about the limits of current visibility once chips leave the factory or reach declared destinations. Supporters present registration and location verification as a feasible, targeted enforcement aid that could also support wider trusted exports and future governance. Opponents counter that a government mandate could be untested, costly, vulnerability-creating, and damaging to trust, privacy, and confidence in U.S. technology.

Cast your vote:

Results (32 votes):

Total (32 votes)

For 27 (84%) Abstain 0 (0%) Against 5 (16%)

For (25)

AI Futures Project
Nonprofit AI forecasting research group behind AI 2027 and Plan A; led by Daniel Kokotajlo.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Smuggled chips make future agreements based on compute governance more difficult to enforce because it is hard for either the US or the Chinese government to trace smuggled chips.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)

added 40min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Alexander
Author and psychiatrist

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Hunting down all existing chips is only slightly harder. Most of these chips are in giant data centers the size of small cities using entire power plants' worth of electricity - so hard to hide. The rest can be traced to their final locations using c...
more AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
FDD Action
Policy advocacy organization

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Mandate location verification for advanced AI chips and enforce reporting requirements to prevent smuggling and diversion to restrict entities (H.R. 3447/S. 1705, the Chip Security Act).
AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026)

added 23min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
David Feith
Senior Fellow at Hudson Institute; former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and National Security Council official

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Chip Security Act (CSA): This counters AI-chip smuggling by requiring advanced chipmakers to implement technical security measures to detect and prevent diversion to unauthorized countries and end users.
AI Verified source (Jun 11, 2026)

added 10min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Brian Mast
U.S. Representative (R-FL)

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

If we're going to export advanced AI chips, we need confidence that they don’t end up in the hands of the Chinese military. We’re continuously seeing examples of Chinese espionage, theft, and diversion over and over again. We can’t allow this to keep...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)

added 23min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
John Moolenaar
U.S. Representative (R-MI)

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

China continues to flout U.S. export controls and this indictment is the latest example. China recognizes the superiority of American AI innovation and will do whatever it must to catch up. That’s why the bipartisan Chip Security Act is urgently need...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Connor Pfeiffer
FDD Action government relations director

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The United States is in a global AI arms race with the Chinese Communist Party, and advanced chips are the crown jewel of American innovation. The Chip Security Act would implement common-sense security measures to prevent these chips from being dive...
more AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2026)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
GeoComply
Location-technology company that provides geolocation compliance and anti-fraud tools for regulated industries.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Advanced AI chips are among the most strategically important technologies in the world—but today’s export controls weren’t built to track them after deployment. [...] Current export controls depend on declared destinations, not real-world verificatio...
more AI Verified source (Mar 3, 2026)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Elizabeth Warren
U.S. Senator (D-MA)

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We have a responsibility to ensure our most advanced technologies do not end up putting American economic and national security at risk. This bill is a commonsense fix to the long-standing challenges of chip smuggling, ensuring our export enforcement...
more AI Verified source (Feb 17, 2026)

added 13min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mark Beall
President of Government Affairs at the AI Policy Network.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I write to express our support for the Chip Security Act (S.1705/H.R.3447) and to share our views on the key provisions of this bipartisan and bicameral legislation to stop advanced U.S. AI chips from falling into the hands of our adversaries. This l...
more AI Verified source (Jan 13, 2026)

added 19min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
CAIS Action Fund
Policy advocacy organization affiliated with the Center for AI Safety, focused on reducing catastrophic AI risks.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Chip Security Act (CSA) requires companies to verify that advanced AI chips remain in authorized locations to prevent diversion to foreign adversaries. [...] Ping-based location verification (PBLV) serves as a clear example of how the CSA's requi...
more AI Verified source (Dec 10, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
With Honor Action
Cross-partisan veterans advocacy organization focused on national security and civic leadership

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Chinese Communist Party has proven time and again that they are bad faith actors when it comes to stealing American innovation. To maintain our AI dominance, we must prevent American technological exports from being diverted into black market baz...
more AI Verified source (Sep 26, 2025)

added 23min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Kit Conklin
Nonresident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council GeoTech Center and senior vice president for risk and compliance at Exiger.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The CSA doesn’t attempt to surge BIS personnel to Southeast Asia or rebuild the export control system from the ground up. Instead, it would introduce a surgical fix: location verification for chips exported abroad. If a chip shows up outside its auth...
more AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Onni Aarne
Compute policy researcher and consultant at the Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, specializing in AI chip location verification and compute governance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Action Plan includes valuable measures to get BIS better information about where and how smuggling is happening, through collaboration with the intelligence community, and location verification. Location verification for AI chips in particular is...
more AI Verified source (Jul 24, 2025)

added 35min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Samuel Hammond
Director of AI Policy and Chief Economist at the Foundation for American Innovation

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Chip Security Act (CSA) is a bipartisan bill that would require high-end AI chips to have the capability to verify their location before being exported. [...] With the confidence that sensitive exports are going to their intended foreign buyers, ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 18, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Dmitri Alperovitch
Co-founder and chairman of Silverado Policy Accelerator; co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike; cybersecurity and national security policy expert.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The idea behind CSA is not to prevent chips from working in banned locations like China but to simply expose more data to exporters of chips (and ultimately Bureau of Industry and Security-U.S. Department of Commerce) on their end-users to enhance in...
more AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2025)

added 35min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Cynthia Lummis
U.S. Senator from Wyoming

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need to make sure that the AI infrastructure isn’t getting siphoned off to China. This bill advances our ability to expand our chips into global markets with peace of mind.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2025)

added 55min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tom Cotton
U.S. Senator from Arkansas (Republican); member of the Senate Intelligence and Armed Services Committees

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We must do better at maintaining and expanding our position in the global market, while safeguarding America’s technological edge. With these enhanced security measures, we can continue to expand access to U.S. technology without compromising our nat...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2025)

added 55min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Raja Krishnamoorthi
U.S. Representative (D-Illinois)

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

If we allow the Chinese Communist Party to continue smuggling our most advanced AI chips into its military and surveillance state, it doesn’t just mean export controls that are on the books are going unenforced—we’re risking America’s technological e...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2025)

added 55min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Darin LaHood
U.S. Representative from Illinois; member of the House Select Committee on China and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI is one of the most high-stakes fronts in our strategic competition with the Chinese Communist Party. The CCP has a track record of exploiting U.S. capital and intellectual property to develop its own advanced technology. I am proud to join my coll...
more AI Verified source (May 20, 2025)

added 35min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott J Mulligan
Early-stage investor at Rainfall Ventures and former MIT Technology Review AI reporter writing on AI policy and chip smuggling.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

But the reality is that we have limited knowledge on the smuggling market and the exact number of chips even being trafficked. So although location verification for AI chips is not a perfect solution to end all smuggling, it could still be an effecti...
more AI Verified source (May 19, 2025)

added 54min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Asher Brass
AI governance researcher at the Institute for AI Policy and Strategy, working on compute governance and chip location verification.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Fortunately, modern AI chips already have capabilities to support technical location verification, which would allow chip owners to easily provide regular verification that their chips remain in the approximate area of their intended destination. Thi...
more AI Verified source (May 16, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bill Foster
U.S. Representative from Illinois and former physicist

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As Congress’ chip designer, AI programmer, and PhD physicist, I know that we have the technical tools to prevent powerful AI technology from getting into the wrong hands. With advanced AI chips being smuggled into China and posing a national security...
more AI Verified source (May 15, 2025)

added 56min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bill Huizenga
U.S. Representative from Michigan

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

American innovation and AI computing technology has the potential to change everything from how we complete daily tasks to unlocking the next era of scientific breakthroughs. In order for the United States to maintain our technological advantage, we ...
more AI Verified source (May 15, 2025)

added 56min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Deric Cheng
Director of Research at Windfall Trust; lead of AGI Social Contract initiative; AI economics and policy researcher

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Registering and tracking the ownership of high-end AI chips has become a widely discussed topic in US policy due to two factors: the developing US/China AI competition as evidenced by recent export controls limiting Chinese AI chip access, and the in...
more AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2024)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Abstain (0)

Against (5)

John Neuffer
President and CEO of the Semiconductor Industry Association

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

SIA members are fully committed to complying with export controls, and we strongly oppose the illicit diversion and misuse of our chip technologies. While we understand policymakers’ interest in addressing this issue, we cannot support blanket mandat...
more AI Verified source (Mar 2, 2026)

added 23min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mike Flynn
Senior Vice President and Counsel for Government Affairs and Economic Security Policy at the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI).

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

Next week, the House Foreign Affairs Committee will consider the Chip Security Act (S.1705 / H.R.3447), which would require companies to track exported AI chips. While there are valid commercial reasons for companies to pursue location verification, ...
more AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)

added 35min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Consumer Technology Association
U.S. trade association representing the consumer technology industry and producer of CES

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

Enacting the current draft of the Chip Security Act (CSA) would erode trust and endanger the Administration’s vision to diffuse U.S. AI technology. Specifically, burdensome rules on U.S. companies not required for foreign competitors risk incentivizi...
more AI Verified source (Oct 27, 2025)

added 22min ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Luke O'Grady
Cybersecurity policy analyst at the Center for Cybersecurity Policy and Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

The Chip Security Act [...] would require American-made advanced chips to come equipped with location-verification capabilities creating new cybersecurity vulnerabilities that could compromise the systems they power. This could have a cascading impac...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Joseph Hoefer
Technology policy analyst and contributor to Tech Policy Press, writing on AI chip tracking and export-control governance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

While the Chip Security Act sounds like a sharp response to a real problem involving export control evasion and technology diversion, it is not currently a viable solution, and even more concerning, it risks doing more harm than good.
AI Verified source (May 29, 2025)

added 1h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

More h/ai-regulation votes

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

Ban autonomous lethal weapons

Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18

AI agents should be granted legal personhood as non-human corporations

Back