We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (5)
ai-regulation (5)
ai-policy (4)
ai-safety (4)
policy (4)
regulations (4)
international-relations (3)
ai-ethics (2)
agi (1)
cybersecurity (1)
existential-risk (1)
future (1)
gov (1)
law (1)
privacy (1)
Top
New
-
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
votes For
and says:
Article I prohibits signatories from developing or deploying artificial superintelligence and from permitting others within their jurisdiction to work towards that end.
AI Verified source (May 12, 2026) -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
113 opinions
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
votes For
and says:
Like the nuclear nonproliferation agreements before it, the draft Agreement aims to prevent the proliferation of technologies that would be catastrophic for humanity if allowed to proceed unchecked.
AI Verified source (May 12, 2026) -
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
votes For
and says:
The draft Agreement thus obliges states to consolidate and monitor sufficiently large clusters of AI chips (Article V), to monitor the supply chain that produces them (Article VI), and to facilitate verification of how they are used (Article VII).
AI Verified source (May 12, 2026) -
Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority
26 opinions
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
votes For
and says:
We focus first on the large-scale training runs that currently produce frontier AI, setting thresholds beyond which training is monitored or prohibited.
AI Verified source (May 12, 2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
56 opinions
Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI)
votes For
and says:
They conclude that the only trajectory without unacceptably high levels of catastrophic harm is a scenario in which humanity develops the ability to monitor and restrict AI development (an “off switch”) and then likely uses it to put a long-term halt...
more AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2026)