We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
future (4)
×
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
agi (2)
ai (2)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-policy (2)
existential-risk (2)
policy (2)
economics (1)
ethics (1)
future-of-work (1)
impact-on-labor (1)
inequality (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
60 opinionsNick Bostrom votes For and says:
For many parameter settings, the optimal strategy would involve moving quickly to AGI capability, then pausing briefly before full deployment: swift to harbor, slow to berth.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026) -
Nick Bostrom votes Against and says:
Developing superintelligence is not like playing Russian roulette; it is more like undergoing risky surgery for a condition that will otherwise prove fatal. [...] Models incorporating safety progress, temporal discounting, quality-of-life differentia...
more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2 -
Nick Bostrom votes For and says:
[...] which, with the right economic policies, would inaugurate an age of abundance.
AI Verified source (2024) -
Nick Bostrom votes For and says:
the greatest existential risks over the coming decades or century arise from certain, anticipated technological breakthroughs that we might make in particular, machine super intelligence,
AI Verified source (2017) 1 of 2