We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-safety (6)
×
ai-governance (5)
ai-policy (5)
ai-regulation (4)
existential-risk (4)
policy (4)
agi (3)
future (3)
ai (2)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-risk (2)
ethics (2)
regulations (2)
cern-for-ai (1)
gov (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
60 opinionsNick Bostrom votes For and says:
For many parameter settings, the optimal strategy would involve moving quickly to AGI capability, then pausing briefly before full deployment: swift to harbor, slow to berth.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026) -
Nick Bostrom votes Against and says:
Developing superintelligence is not like playing Russian roulette; it is more like undergoing risky surgery for a condition that will otherwise prove fatal. [...] Models incorporating safety progress, temporal discounting, quality-of-life differentia...
more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2 -
Nick Bostrom votes For and says:
once we have full AGI, super intelligence might be quite close on the heels of that.
AI Verified source (2025) -
Nick Bostrom votes For and says:
the greatest existential risks over the coming decades or century arise from certain, anticipated technological breakthroughs that we might make in particular, machine super intelligence,
AI Verified source (2017) 1 of 2 -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
151 opinionsNick Bostrom votes For and says:
Superintelligence could become extremely powerful and be able to shape the future according to its preferences. [...] If humanity had been sane and had our act together globally, the sensible course of action would be to postpone development of super...
more AI Verified source (Aug 22, 2014) -
Nick Bostrom votes For and says: