We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (4)
ai-regulation (4)
policy (4)
regulations (4)
×
ai-policy (3)
ethics (3)
ai-safety (2)
international-relations (2)
public-interest-ai (2)
ai (1)
defense (1)
gov (1)
law (1)
research-policy (1)
tech-ethics (1)
Top
New
-
Stuart J. Russell votes For and says:
"I've spoken to engineers in those companies who think it's now 60 or 70%," Russell said, referring to the probability of catastrophic outcomes from AI development. "So we're off by a factor of 10 to 50 million. And so that's not a very impressive en...
more Unverifiable source (Feb 19, 2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
155 opinionsStuart J. Russell votes For and says:
For governments to allow private entities to essentially play Russian roulette with every human being on earth is, in my view, a total dereliction of duty [...] Each of the CEOs of the main AI companies, I believe, wants to disarm but cannot do so "u...
more Unverifiable source (Feb 17, 2026) -
Stuart J. Russell votes For and says:
And a second point is about liability. And it's not completely clear where exactly the liability should lie. But to continue the nuclear analogy, if a corporation decided they wanted to sell a lot of enriched uranium in supermarkets, and someone deci...
more Unverifiable source (2023) -
Stuart J. Russell votes For and says:
Allowing machines to choose to kill humans would be devastating to our security and freedom. [...] the window to act is closing fast.
AI Verified source (2018)