We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
Tim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expert
I am this person!
Location: United Kingdom
ai-policy (7)
×
ai-regulation (7)
ai-safety (7)
ai-governance (6)
policy (5)
regulations (4)
democracy (2)
ethics (2)
future (2)
gov (2)
agi (1)
ai-ethics (1)
cybersecurity (1)
data-privacy (1)
digital-democracy (1)
Top
New
-
Lord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
This episode—and, potentially, the recent OpenAI episode mentioned by some of the noble Baronesses—shows that what we have built in this country is not technological independence but, in the AI Minister’s own phrase, a search for strategic leverage. ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026) -
Lord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
Finally, in the face of autonomous AI threats, the Government need an ultimate backstop. We support proposals from ControlAI to introduce strictly constrained last resort powers, allowing the Secretary of State to direct the shutdown of data centres ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026) -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
133 opinionsLord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
Children’s exposure to these AI chatbots demands the strongest safeguards.
AI Verified source (Jun 5, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
193 opinionsLord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
The decisions made in the coming years will shape AI’s trajectory for decades, and those decisions require democratic oversight, not deference to whoever controls the infrastructure.
AI Verified source (Jun 5, 2026) -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
111 opinionsLord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
They call for international red lines to prevent unacceptable AI risks, including prohibiting superintelligence development, until there is broad scientific consensus on how it can be done safely and with strong public buy-in.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
160 opinionsLord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
They call for international red lines to prevent unacceptable AI risks, including prohibiting superintelligence development, until there is broad scientific consensus on how it can be done safely and with strong public buy-in.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026) -
Lord Clement-Jones votes For and says:
They call for international red lines to prevent unacceptable AI risks, including prohibiting superintelligence development, until there is broad scientific consensus on how it can be done safely and with strong public buy-in.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)