We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
Cambridge faculty - AI alignment, DL, and existential safety. Formerly Mila, FHI, DeepMind, ElementAI, AISI.
I am this person!
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
future (3)
×
ai-ethics (2)
ai-policy (2)
existential-risk (2)
policy (2)
agi (1)
ai (1)
ethics (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
63 opinions
David Krueger
votes For
and says:
None of these approaches that you'll often hear mentioned—interpretability, testing or alignment—is technically adequate. We don't know how to build superintelligent AI safely. The plan is basically to roll the dice.
AI Verified source (Feb 2, 2026) -
David Krueger
votes For
and says:
We need to course correct immediately and work to prevent the development of superintelligent AI, and we need to do this internationally, which will take time. We cannot afford to wait for more evidence that the risk is imminent.
AI Verified source (Feb 2, 2026) -
David Krueger
votes For
and says:
AI might literally lead to human extinction, in the same way that humans have caused many other species to go extinct.
AI Verified source (2026)