We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai (10)
×
ai-regulation (6)
policy (6)
ai-policy (5)
economics (5)
impact-on-labor (5)
ai-governance (4)
future-of-work (4)
existential-risk (3)
inequality (3)
agi (2)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-risk (2)
ai-safety (2)
future (2)
Top
New
-
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
The key challenge in such a world won’t be incentivizing growth, but finding a way for everyone to share in the benefits.
Unverifiable source (Jun 10, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
abstains
and says:
But at the same time we should recognize that there’s a decent possibility that, despite all our efforts, AI still causes significant enduring job loss—and that this may be an intrinsic property of the technology and the way it broadly replicates hum...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
39 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
If AI-driven labor displacement ends up being large in magnitude and permanently drives down the demand for labor, it will likely be necessary to go beyond mere incentive programs to long-term income support for a significant fraction of the labor fo...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes Against
and says:
It is not clear where these people will go or what they will do, and I am concerned that they could form an unemployed or very-low-wage “underclass.”
AI Verified source (Feb 2026) -
Dario Amodei
abstains
and says:
We don't know if the models are conscious. We are not even sure that we know what it would mean for a model to be conscious or whether a model can be conscious. [...] But we're open to the idea that it could be.
AI Verified source (2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
I don’t know exactly when it’ll come, I don’t know if it’ll be 2027. I think it’s plausible it could be longer than that. I don’t think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than...
more Unverifiable source (2025) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
I don’t know exactly when it’ll come, I don’t know if it’ll be 2027. I think it’s plausible it could be longer than that. I don’t think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than...
more AI Verified source (2025) -
-
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
This means that in 2026-2027 we could end up in one of two starkly different worlds. In the US, multiple companies will definitely have the required millions of chips (at the cost of tens of billions of dollars). The question is whether China will al...
more AI Verified source (Jan 2025) 1 of 2