We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (4)
ai-regulation (4)
ethics (4)
×
ai-safety (3)
policy (3)
ai (2)
ai-policy (2)
regulations (2)
ai-risk (1)
defense (1)
future (1)
impact-on-labor (1)
international-relations (1)
open-source (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Each frontier AI company commits to giving ongoing, employee-like access to a team of embedded third-party evaluators (such as METR), whose role is to verify adherence to safety practices and commitments, report incidents, and help assess the alignme...
more AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026) -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
A full pacing, or even “pause”, in which participating governments agree to substantially limit the overall rate of AI development. I support floating this, but I think it is unlikely to actually happen any time soon.
Unverifiable source (Sep 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes Against
and says:
From a business perspective, the difference between open and closed is a little bit overblown. From a security perspective, the difference between open and closed models is, for some intents and purposes, overblown. The most important thing is how po...
more AI Verified source (2025)