We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (6)
international-relations (6)
×
policy (6)
ai-policy (5)
ai-regulation (5)
regulations (5)
ai-safety (3)
ai (2)
defense (2)
gov (2)
public-interest-ai (2)
trade (2)
china (1)
democracy (1)
ethics (1)
Top
New
-
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
58 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
It would have to be the case that all of the relevant AI players, including geopolitical adversaries, would have agree to it, and it would have be verifiable.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Safety incidents in the four critical areas must be reported promptly.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
First, we should absolutely not be selling chips, chip-making tools, or datacenters to the CCP.
AI Verified source (Jan 31, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Second, it makes sense to use AI to empower democracies to resist autocracies. This is the reason Anthropic considers it important to provide AI to the intelligence and defense communities in the US and its democratic allies. Defending democracies th...
more AI Verified source (Jan 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
This means that in 2026-2027 we could end up in one of two starkly different worlds. In the US, multiple companies will definitely have the required millions of chips (at the cost of tens of billions of dollars). The question is whether China will al...
more AI Verified source (Jan 2025) 1 of 2