We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (13)
policy (13)
regulations (13)
×
ai-regulation (11)
ai-safety (7)
ai-policy (6)
international-relations (6)
ai (4)
law (4)
gov (3)
public-interest-ai (3)
transparency (3)
ai-risk (2)
defense (2)
digital-democracy (2)
Top
New
-
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Each frontier AI company commits to giving ongoing, employee-like access to a team of embedded third-party evaluators (such as METR), whose role is to verify adherence to safety practices and commitments, report incidents, and help assess the alignme...
more AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
An agreement by both sides to test their models before release for acute risks in areas such as cybersecurity, biology, and alignment.
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Frontier AI models, like airplanes, should be required to go through technical testing and auditing, and their release should be blocked or reversed as a threat to public safety if they do not meet high standards of safety.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026) 1 of 3 -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
This means that in 2026-2027 we could end up in one of two starkly different worlds. In the US, multiple companies will definitely have the required millions of chips (at the cost of tens of billions of dollars). The question is whether China will al...
more AI Verified source (Jan 2025) 1 of 3 -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Frontier AI models, like airplanes, should be required to go through technical testing and auditing, and their release should be blocked or reversed as a threat to public safety if they do not meet high standards of safety.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026) 1 of 5 -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
165 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
It would have to be the case that all of the relevant AI players, including geopolitical adversaries, would have agree to it, and it would have be verifiable.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026) 1 of 3 -
Dario Amodei
votes Against
and says:
To summarize my and Anthropic’s position, we have not and are not advocating for a ban on open-weights models as a category. We should instead focus on keeping powerful chips out of authoritarian hands, stopping industrial-scale distillation, and req...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Safety incidents in the four critical areas must be reported promptly.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Safety incidents in the four critical areas must be reported promptly.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) 1 of 2 -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
But today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is on...
more AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026) 1 of 4 -
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
First, we should absolutely not be selling chips, chip-making tools, or datacenters to the CCP.
AI Verified source (Jan 31, 2026)