Dario Amodei

From a business perspective, the difference between open and closed is a little bit overblown. From a security perspective, the difference between open and closed models is, for some intents and purposes, overblown. The most important thing is how po... more Verified source (2025)

Today, frontier AI systems are simply not reliable enough to power fully autonomous weapons. We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk [...] fully autonomous weapons cannot be relied upon to exercis... more Verified source (2026)

We're under an incredible amount of commercial pressure and make it even harder for ourselves because we have all this safety stuff we do that I think we do more than other companies. [...] The pressure to survive economically, while also keeping our... more Unverified source (2026)

He also noted the standard should require AI developers to adopt policies for testing models and publicly disclose them [...] Unverified source (2026)

artificial intelligence companies, including his own, should be subject to mandatory testing requirements to ensure their technologies are safe for the public before release. Unverified source (2024)

I think this is crazy... like selling nuclear weapons to North Korea and bragging, oh yeah, Boeing made the casings. AI Verified source (2026)

After drawing a hard line against AI abuses in democracies, we should use that precedent to create an international taboo against the worst abuses of powerful AI. [...] I recognize that the current political winds have turned against international co... more Unverified source (2026)

We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our... more Unverified source (2026)

We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our... more Unverified source (2026)

It is mortgaging our future as as a country to to sell these chips to China. Unverified source (2025)

We need both a way to frequently monitor these emerging risks, and a protocol for responding appropriately when they occur. Autonomous AI systems that escape human control pose a significant threat to society. Unverified source (2023)

The right place to start is with transparency legislation, which essentially tries to require that every frontier AI company engage in [safety and transparency] practices. California's SB 53 and New York's RAISE Act are examples of this kind of legis... more Unverified source (2026)

Regulate AI the way you regulate cars and aeroplanes — mandatory, third-party-assessed, and built around safety standards. [...] Does the car have brakes, does it have airbags, does it have seat belts? Unverified source (2026)

In simulated scenarios where it was told it would be shut down, Claude sometimes blackmailed fictional employees who controlled its shutdown button. Independent tests demonstrated that this is not an isolated bug: Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.5 blackma... more Unverified source (2026)