We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Dario Amodei
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
future (5)
×
ai-regulation (4)
ai (3)
ai-governance (3)
ai-policy (3)
ai-safety (3)
agi (2)
ai-ethics (2)
economics (2)
existential-risk (2)
impact-on-labor (2)
policy (2)
competition (1)
ethics (1)
future-of-work (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
A full pacing, or even “pause”, in which participating governments agree to substantially limit the overall rate of AI development. I support floating this, but I think it is unlikely to actually happen any time soon.
Unverifiable source (Sep 2026)
added 10d ago
-
The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity
31 opinions
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
The thing to worry about is a level of wealth concentration that will break society.
AI Verified source (Jan 2026)
added 1mo ago
-
Dario Amodei
votes Against
and says:
[...] the idea of stopping or even substantially slowing [...] is fundamentally untenable. If one company does not build it [...] authoritarian countries would simply keep going.
AI Verified source (Jan 2026)
added 5mo ago
-
Dario Amodei
votes For
and says:
I don’t know exactly when it’ll come, I don’t know if it’ll be 2027. I think it’s plausible it could be longer than that. I don’t think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than...
more AI Verified source (2025)
added 10mo ago
-