We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-regulation (5)
future (5)
×
ai-governance (4)
ai-policy (4)
ai-safety (4)
ai (3)
existential-risk (3)
ai-ethics (2)
ethics (2)
policy (2)
agi (1)
ai-risk (1)
competition (1)
economics (1)
impact-on-labor (1)
Top
New
-
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
60 opinions
Daniel Kokotajlo
votes For
and says:
If you delay the advent of superintelligence, then that gives society more time to prepare and more time to solve the various problems that it represents.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026) -
Daniel Kokotajlo
votes For
and says:
If you delay the advent of superintelligence, then that gives society more time to prepare and more time to solve the various problems that it represents.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026) -
Daniel Kokotajlo
votes For
and says:
We at the Futures Project think that there's a 70% chance of all humans dead or something similarly bad.
AI Verified source (Mar 28, 2026) -
The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity
12 opinions
Daniel Kokotajlo
votes For
and says:
We will end up in a very concentrated world where there's like one to five giant networks of data centres owned by one to five companies, possibly in coordination with their governments. [...] If you've only got one to five companies and they each ha...
more Unverifiable source (2026) -
Daniel Kokotajlo
votes Against
and says: