We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (11)
ai-regulation (11)
regulations (11)
×
policy (9)
ai-policy (5)
ai-safety (5)
ethics (4)
international-relations (4)
digital-democracy (3)
law (3)
privacy (3)
public-interest-ai (3)
research-policy (3)
ai-ethics (2)
data-privacy (2)
Top
New
-
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
155 opinions
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We've talked about the need to pace it as the models get more capable, which I think is in everyone's interest.
Unverifiable source (Jul 30, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
179 opinions
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
The technology’s future must be shaped by people, democratic institutions and society as a whole, not just by the companies building the most capable systems
AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026) 1 of 4 -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
133 opinions
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We need an international forum for discussion that establishes globally accepted standards for testing, provides expert and impartial analysis of capabilities and risks, and serves as a venue for cooperation among nations.
AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We need an international forum for discussion that establishes globally accepted standards for testing, provides expert and impartial analysis of capabilities and risks, and serves as a venue for cooperation among nations.
AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026) -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
468 opinions
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions.
AI Verified source (2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions.
AI Verified source (2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions.
Unverifiable source (2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, ...
more Unverifiable source (2026) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
However, if liability frameworks are too lax, negative externalities may appear where a company benefits from lack of oversight and regulation at the expense [...]
AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2023) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
I mean, I think a minimum is that users should be able to, to sort of opt out from having their data used by companies like ours or the social media companies. It should be easy to delete your data. I think those are, it should, but the thing that I ...
more AI Verified source (2023) -
Sam Altman
votes For
and says:
First, it is vital that AI companies–especially those working on the most powerful models–adhere to an appropriate set of safety requirements, including internal and external testing prior to release and publication of evaluation results.
Unverifiable source