We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-safety (22)
×
ai-governance (20)
ai-regulation (19)
ai-policy (17)
policy (17)
regulations (13)
ethics (7)
research-policy (6)
ai-ethics (5)
ai-risk (5)
gov (5)
public-interest-ai (5)
transparency (5)
existential-risk (4)
future (4)
Top
New
-
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
OpenAI told two House Democrats that its engineers are developing “automated shutdown capabilities” for AI systems.
AI Verified source (Sep 2, 2026) -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
548 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Guided by our National Security Principles, we approach national security deployments with safeguards, meaningful human judgment, and appropriate oversight, especially in high-stakes settings.
AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2026) 1 of 3 -
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
86 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
First, the federal government should lead the testing and evaluation of the most advanced systems. Frontier AI raises national security and public safety questions that require technical expertise, resources, and access that no state can fully replic...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Nations should work together to develop compatible safety frameworks, trusted channels for sharing risk findings, and coordinated responses to incidents.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026) -
AI labs should conduct risk assessments before high-stakes internal deployment of frontier models
37 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
We also applied the method to challenging agentic rollouts, showing that it can extend beyond standard chat to more complex agent settings involving tool use, and can also be used for risk assessment before internal model deployments.
AI Verified source (Jun 16, 2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Transformative technologies can concentrate power, or they can broaden it. They can make life easier for a few, or they can expand opportunity for many. Our approach is rooted in the belief that AI should work for people: helping them pursue their ow...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026) -
Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely
114 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
One goal of such an organization should be to make it possible for the world to take coordinated action, including slowing frontier development when needed, so societal resilience, safety, and alignment can keep pace.
AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026) -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
166 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
OpenAI has long believed there should ultimately be an international organization that helps coordinate leading AI efforts to reduce catastrophic risk. One goal of such an organization should be to make it possible for the world to take coordinated a...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026) 1 of 2 -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
137 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
We support strong, enforceable, risk-based regulations for teen safety and frameworks that pair robust safeguards with transparency and tools that put families in control. That includes requirements for privacy-preserving age assurance so companies c...
more AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Policymakers should require the most capable frontier models to undergo a CAISI evaluation before public release. These evaluations should assess frontier capabilities, the effectiveness of associated safeguards and mitigations, and the resulting ris...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026) 1 of 3 -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures th...
more AI Verified source (Apr 2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
Today, we find that models’ reasoning is generally interpretable and easy to monitor. However, in the future, monitorability may break down for a variety of reasons.
AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
This policy protects employees’ rights to raise issues, including about AI safety, applicable laws, or company policies.
AI Verified source (Jan 12, 2026) 1 of 2 -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
In the US, we support state efforts to align around common frameworks such as California SB 53, the New York RAISE Act, and Illinois SB 315, which emphasize transparency, public reporting around catastrophic-risk evaluations and safety incidents, whi...
more AI Verified source (2026) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
By default, we provide information and access to models that are intended to be public or production-ready. When the evaluations necessitate it, we provide deeper access, such as to helpful-only models or non-public information. OpenAI has provided t...
more AI Verified source (Nov 19, 2025) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
194 opinions
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
No single person or institution should define how an ideal AI should behave for everyone. To fulfill our mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity, OpenAI needs to build systems that reflect the wide range of values and priorities of all ...
more AI Verified source (2025) 1 of 2 -
OpenAI
votes Against
and says:
We are likely to eventually need something like an IAEA for superintelligence efforts; any effort above a certain capability (or resources like compute) threshold will need to be subject to an international authority that can inspect systems, require...
more Unverifiable source (May 22, 2023) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts to ensure that the development of superintelligence occurs in a manner that allows us to both maintain safety and help smooth integration of these systems with society. ...
more AI Verified source (May 22, 2023) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts to ensure that the development of superintelligence occurs in a manner that allows us to both maintain safety and help smooth integration of these systems with society. ...
more AI Verified source (May 22, 2023) -
OpenAI
votes For
and says:
First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts to ensure that the development of superintelligence occurs in a manner that allows us to both maintain safety and help smooth integration of these systems with society. ...
more AI Verified source (May 22, 2023) -
OpenAI
abstains
and says:
First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts to ensure that the development of superintelligence occurs in a manner that allows us to both maintain safety and help smooth integration of these systems with society. ...
more Unverifiable source (May 22, 2023)