OpenAI

If safety is the priority, such a national standard is the best policy approach to ensure the US continues to lead in innovation and not be undermined by a patchwork of regulations.

Nations should work together to develop compatible safety frameworks, trusted channels for sharing risk findings, and coordinated responses to incidents.

OpenAI has long believed there should ultimately be an international organization that helps coordinate leading AI efforts to reduce catastrophic risk. One goal of such an organization should be to make it possible for the world to take coordinated a...

Liability frameworks should preserve accountability for severe harms and should not provide blanket safe harbors from responsibility.

We support strong, enforceable, risk-based regulations for teen safety and frameworks that pair robust safeguards with transparency and tools that put families in control. That includes requirements for privacy-preserving age assurance so companies c...

Because the potential benefits are so significant, it is essential that young people can access AI in ways that are safe, age-appropriate, and supportive of healthy development.

Large frontier developers should annually retain an independent third party to audit compliance with frontier safety requirements, including implementation of the developer’s frontier AI framework, internal controls, and governance structures.

Policymakers should require the most capable frontier models to undergo a CAISI evaluation before public release. These evaluations should assess frontier capabilities, the effectiveness of associated safeguards and mitigations, and the resulting ris...

Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures th...

No use of OpenAI technology for mass domestic surveillance.

The AI System will not be used to independently direct autonomous weapons in any case where law, regulation, or Department policy requires human control.

The AI System will not be used to independently direct autonomous weapons in any case where law, regulation, or Department policy requires human control, nor will it be used to assume other high-stakes decisions that require approval by a human decis...

No use of OpenAI technology for mass domestic surveillance.

No single person or institution should define how an ideal AI should behave for everyone. To fulfill our mission of ensuring that AGI benefits all of humanity, OpenAI needs to build systems that reflect the wide range of values and priorities of all ...

ChatGPT, for instance, improves by further training on the conversations people have with it, unless you opt out.

We recognize that generating speech that resembles people's voices has serious risks, which are especially top of mind in an election year. We are engaging with U.S. and international partners from across government, media, entertainment, education, ...

First, we need some degree of coordination among the leading development efforts to ensure that the development of superintelligence occurs in a manner that allows us to both maintain safety and help smooth integration of these systems with society. ...

Second, we are likely to eventually need something like an IAEA for superintelligence efforts; any effort above a certain capability (or resources like compute) threshold will need to be subject to an international authority that can inspect systems,...